<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Krishna Reveals Himself To Those Who Love Him</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brijabasispirit.com/2010/01/06/krishna-reveals-himself-to-those-who-love-him/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brijabasispirit.com/2010/01/06/krishna-reveals-himself-to-those-who-love-him/</link>
	<description>Plain Living High Thinking</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 16:04:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Akruranatha</title>
		<link>http://www.brijabasispirit.com/2010/01/06/krishna-reveals-himself-to-those-who-love-him/comment-page-1/#comment-14204</link>
		<dc:creator>Akruranatha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 22:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brijabasispirit.com/?p=2499#comment-14204</guid>
		<description>Nice article.  I do not think it is being &quot;hardliner.&quot; It is being enlightened by Srila Prabhupada&#039;s instructions.  

Krishna clearly says in Gita that worship of demigods for temporary fruits (like money) is not the way to approach Him.  &quot;Yanti deva-vratan devan...&quot;  It is for less intelligent, &quot;alpa medhasam&quot;.  It is &quot;avidhi purvakam&quot;, a &quot;wrong way&quot; to worship.  We should remember and understand these teachings of Gita and Prabhupada.

Yes, Laksmi is an expansion of Radha, so worship Laksmi-Narayan, Radha-Krishna, Hare Krishna, together.  Not that you worship Laksmi without Narayan, because she gives more money that way (?) Taking Sita away from Ram is business of Ravana. 

We want pure bhakti, not money.  If we go for Krishna bhakti, we will find we have the money we really need, but if we go for money, we may forget that the real treasure and goal of life is Krishna prema, which is very rare.  Remember Sanatan Goswami and the touchstone. (He kept it with the garbage).  Whatever money you get, without Narayan, will be flickering, fickle, not of lasting value.  Another name for Laksmi is &quot;cancala&quot;.  However, she remains always faithful on the chest of Vishnu, Madhava, Krishna.  She is not faithful to anyone else.    

The Goswamis may have written of worshiping Ganesha to remove obstacles in devotional service, but Srila Prabhupada said we should pray to Six Goswamis to remove those obstacles and not Ganesha.  We do not have to feel anything is lacking if we only worship Krishna.  Wherever there is Krishna and Arjuna there is opulence, morality, power and victory.

Seeking bhogaisvarya, foolish people are deviated from their determination to become pure devotees and go back to Radha-Krishna, Laksmi-Narayana.  Of course we love and revere demigods as great devotees of Krishna and never envy them, but we are on the path of pure goodness, Narayana parayana.  All demigods and ancestors will be most satisfied if we chant Hare Krishna and study Prabhupada&#039;s books and please Krishna by pure devotion, not by inventing some method of worship not recommended by Prabhupada.  Water the root of the tree and the leaves will be nourished.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article.  I do not think it is being &#8220;hardliner.&#8221; It is being enlightened by Srila Prabhupada&#8217;s instructions.  </p>
<p>Krishna clearly says in Gita that worship of demigods for temporary fruits (like money) is not the way to approach Him.  &#8220;Yanti deva-vratan devan&#8230;&#8221;  It is for less intelligent, &#8220;alpa medhasam&#8221;.  It is &#8220;avidhi purvakam&#8221;, a &#8220;wrong way&#8221; to worship.  We should remember and understand these teachings of Gita and Prabhupada.</p>
<p>Yes, Laksmi is an expansion of Radha, so worship Laksmi-Narayan, Radha-Krishna, Hare Krishna, together.  Not that you worship Laksmi without Narayan, because she gives more money that way (?) Taking Sita away from Ram is business of Ravana. </p>
<p>We want pure bhakti, not money.  If we go for Krishna bhakti, we will find we have the money we really need, but if we go for money, we may forget that the real treasure and goal of life is Krishna prema, which is very rare.  Remember Sanatan Goswami and the touchstone. (He kept it with the garbage).  Whatever money you get, without Narayan, will be flickering, fickle, not of lasting value.  Another name for Laksmi is &#8220;cancala&#8221;.  However, she remains always faithful on the chest of Vishnu, Madhava, Krishna.  She is not faithful to anyone else.    </p>
<p>The Goswamis may have written of worshiping Ganesha to remove obstacles in devotional service, but Srila Prabhupada said we should pray to Six Goswamis to remove those obstacles and not Ganesha.  We do not have to feel anything is lacking if we only worship Krishna.  Wherever there is Krishna and Arjuna there is opulence, morality, power and victory.</p>
<p>Seeking bhogaisvarya, foolish people are deviated from their determination to become pure devotees and go back to Radha-Krishna, Laksmi-Narayana.  Of course we love and revere demigods as great devotees of Krishna and never envy them, but we are on the path of pure goodness, Narayana parayana.  All demigods and ancestors will be most satisfied if we chant Hare Krishna and study Prabhupada&#8217;s books and please Krishna by pure devotion, not by inventing some method of worship not recommended by Prabhupada.  Water the root of the tree and the leaves will be nourished.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amar</title>
		<link>http://www.brijabasispirit.com/2010/01/06/krishna-reveals-himself-to-those-who-love-him/comment-page-1/#comment-13903</link>
		<dc:creator>Amar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 00:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brijabasispirit.com/?p=2499#comment-13903</guid>
		<description>Why do we have to be so negatively hardliner like Muslims or Evanglist?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do we have to be so negatively hardliner like Muslims or Evanglist?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vrajavihari</title>
		<link>http://www.brijabasispirit.com/2010/01/06/krishna-reveals-himself-to-those-who-love-him/comment-page-1/#comment-13886</link>
		<dc:creator>vrajavihari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 10:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brijabasispirit.com/?p=2499#comment-13886</guid>
		<description>I agree fully with Rama Lila. It is only forbidden if we worship the demigods forgetting that Shri Radha Krishna are supreme. If we worship them with Krishna prasadam, and in prayer after offering our praise first to God and Guru, then there is no trouble. Even Haribhaktivilasa encourages worship of the Demigods in a Krishna Concious mood. As Rama Lila says, the demigods are far superior devotees of Shri Yugala Kishora than we are; so seeking their blessings for Krishna Conciousness as well as the material stability to do so is not wrong. Especially when worshipping Lakshmi Devi, an emanation of Shri Radharani, who is perpetually engaged in serving the lotus feet of Bhagavan Vishnu, there is no problem - especially when we remember who she herself is serving :) Radhe Shyaam!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree fully with Rama Lila. It is only forbidden if we worship the demigods forgetting that Shri Radha Krishna are supreme. If we worship them with Krishna prasadam, and in prayer after offering our praise first to God and Guru, then there is no trouble. Even Haribhaktivilasa encourages worship of the Demigods in a Krishna Concious mood. As Rama Lila says, the demigods are far superior devotees of Shri Yugala Kishora than we are; so seeking their blessings for Krishna Conciousness as well as the material stability to do so is not wrong. Especially when worshipping Lakshmi Devi, an emanation of Shri Radharani, who is perpetually engaged in serving the lotus feet of Bhagavan Vishnu, there is no problem &#8211; especially when we remember who she herself is serving <img src='http://www.brijabasispirit.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Radhe Shyaam!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rama Lila</title>
		<link>http://www.brijabasispirit.com/2010/01/06/krishna-reveals-himself-to-those-who-love-him/comment-page-1/#comment-13874</link>
		<dc:creator>Rama Lila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 23:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brijabasispirit.com/?p=2499#comment-13874</guid>
		<description>As far as I know Goddess Lakshmi is not a demigod/goddess..She is an direct expansion of Srimati Radharani and the consort of Lord Vishnu...I do not think you should be so hard on yourself for praying to Her..in the NOD it is stated that Vaisnavas should worship Lord Ganapati (Ganesha) to remove obstacles on the path of devotion. I have found in my life that poverty for most devotees has been an obstacle in their lives. They struggle to meet the basic necessities then become bitter to the philosophy and Sri Krishna. I have experienced throughout my life as a devotee that the demigods were given such a bad rap that devotees feel guilty about even mentioning their names..I think we should remember that they are far superior devotees of Lord Vishnu than we are. To ask for their help to connect us more to the Lord I feel is not out of boundaries..I know devotees feel guilty for asking for material gains but we end up asking someone such as Indian donors, parents, grandparents, etc. I think we need to feel less guilty about material gains and as Sudama brahman realized, see them as a source of liberation rather than degradation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as I know Goddess Lakshmi is not a demigod/goddess..She is an direct expansion of Srimati Radharani and the consort of Lord Vishnu&#8230;I do not think you should be so hard on yourself for praying to Her..in the NOD it is stated that Vaisnavas should worship Lord Ganapati (Ganesha) to remove obstacles on the path of devotion. I have found in my life that poverty for most devotees has been an obstacle in their lives. They struggle to meet the basic necessities then become bitter to the philosophy and Sri Krishna. I have experienced throughout my life as a devotee that the demigods were given such a bad rap that devotees feel guilty about even mentioning their names..I think we should remember that they are far superior devotees of Lord Vishnu than we are. To ask for their help to connect us more to the Lord I feel is not out of boundaries..I know devotees feel guilty for asking for material gains but we end up asking someone such as Indian donors, parents, grandparents, etc. I think we need to feel less guilty about material gains and as Sudama brahman realized, see them as a source of liberation rather than degradation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

